TAO makes TAO waste! Messari researcher dissects Bittensor's network effects
Original article: "Breaking Down Bittensor's Network Effects" Author: Seth Bloomberg (Messari Researcher) Compiled: Zombie Messari Researcher Seth Bloomberg recently published an article on X, detailing the network effects of Bittensor and potential bottlenecks for future development.
The following is the original compilation:
Due to the recent discussions about Bittensor, I would like to share my views and some concerns about it.
Thanks to Saypien (former Messari executive) for the extensive discussion on this topic, and also thanks to Sami Kassab (former Messari researcher), I know he will come to point out my mistakes here.
A basic layer network must establish network effects to succeed, in order to attract and retain users and developers. For smart contract platforms like Ethereum, network effects come from on chain liquidity and stable execution capabilities. For Bittensor, its current network effects come from:
1) Familiar with AI/ML developers who mine on the internet (i.e. developers who create AI models and services);
2) A deep liquidity TAO market that can absorb the selling pressure of tokens. Usually, less mature networks are more susceptible to token selling pressure.
Due to the widespread applicability of (2) to most encrypted networks, I will primarily focus on (1). Specifically, the network effect or flywheel effect generated by (1) is as follows: the new subnet benefits from experienced AI/ML Bittensor developers who continuously produce high-quality results → AI/ML engineers benefit from continuous TAO token issuances. It can be expected that the revenue from TAO tokens, combined with Bittensor's AI/ML talent, will continue to attract more subnet builders, thereby attracting more AI/ML talent and forming a cycle.
Whether you are bearish or bullish on TAO, it is worth exploring how this network effect may collapse. So, let's get started.
Scenario 1: TAO token revenue<operating expenses
AI/ML talents are attracted to the internet because the TAO token returns they receive exceed their operating costs on Bittensor. Mathematics is simple: there is no need to raise a large amount of funds, acquire customers, or generate income. Just integrate the model into Bittensor's subnet and earn TAO token issuance revenue. The assumption of this model is that your earnings (based on current or expected TAO value) should be able to cover your expenses denominated in US dollars. If this account is not established, AI/ML talents will choose to leave Bittensor and seek other opportunities.
Scenario 2: Opportunity Cost Calculation
Imagine you are a skilled AI/ML developer on Bittensor, or you are a small team of two or three AI/ML developers building projects on Bittensor. At some point, you have to ask yourself: 'What is the opportunity cost of continuing to be a miner here?' Well, you know the upside benefits of staying on Bittensor only come from the issuance of TAO tokens and the rise in TAO token prices. With the benefits on this side, you also need to consider the other side: whether creating a new protocol without Bittensor can bring greater benefits? I know... this may be considered 'blasphemy' for some people, but if you don't consider this, then you're not taking responsibility for yourself.
Bittensor has realized the need to provide additional incentive benefits for subnets and their miners. 'Dynamic TAO' seems to be their approved solution.
It is currently running on the testing network, so it is likely to be launched by the end of this year or early next year. Through dynamic TAO, each subnet will have a fund pool similar to Uniswap V2, which will pair and price subnet tokens with TAO. The 'dynamic' aspect of this upgrade lies in the new dynamic TAO token issuance model: the more TAOs pledged in the fund pool, the more TAO tokens allocated to subnets, and the higher the price of subnet tokens. It sounds very cost-effective. AI developers can gain appreciation of subnet tokens while retaining their advantage in the Bittensor ecosystem (i.e. TAO token issuance).
However, pairing subnet tokens with TAO for pricing will set an "artificial upper limit" on the valuation of individual subnet tokens. Ethereum and its L2 or Helium and its subDAOs also have similar token dynamic relationships. This is where opportunity cost calculation comes into play. If you are one of these powerful AI/ML developers or subnet owners, why limit yourself in the way mentioned above? Why not just establish your own protocol or network? I dare say that some venture capitalists may be eager to fund you after seeing a bunch of mediocre AI and encryption projects, and this valuation may be higher than a rigorously designed subnet. Or even better, you have accumulated a large amount of TAO during mining, and after calculation, you believe that you can self fund to establish your own protocol, attract some applications, users, and revenue, and then consider external funding (which is rare today).
In my opinion, this is the long-term challenge Bittensor needs to face - designing mechanisms, incentives, and ecosystems to retain the best AI/ML talent.
I think a recent tweet from mrink0 (Delphi Digital researcher) also hinted at this issue (if not, please forgive me for taking it out of context; if there is an error, please correct me). In my opinion, people like Nous (open-source AI research organization Nous Research) leaving Bittensor to build their own networks indicate that for some Bittensor developers, the incentive to stay in Bittensor is currently not enough to compete with building and publishing their own networks.
Addendum:
After mrink0, in Seth Bloomberg's comment section, he pointed out that he agrees with most of Seth Bloomberg's views and stated that the key challenge will be whether Bittensor can attract a model that can solve the problem of people being willing to pay. Otherwise, it will only be (temporary) token emissions.
Seth Bloomberg gave the following response to this:
Even if the model solves the problem of people being willing to pay, miners may not necessarily benefit from it in any way. People will pay for applications or products that use these models, but the protocol does not define any mechanism for miners to share these benefits. The worst-case scenario is that the demand for miners increases (inference costs rise), but they are unable to generate any income from these applications or products. The income of Bittensor miners cannot increase with the demand or revenue of the applications they serve.
(责任编辑:新股)
- ·2025年中国比特币交易平台 币圈交易平台app排名
- ·芝麻交易所ouyi加密货币钱包在线下载-芝麻交易所web3钱包免费版v6.3.7安装地址
- ·数字货币排名的APp是哪个 比特币模拟交易软件
- ·工业气体概念31日主力净流入146.62万元,南大光电、创元科技居前
- ·正规虚拟币交易平台究竟有哪些平台 比特币平台排名
- ·玖富万卡在放款中失败了是什么原因呢?
- ·比特币和主流币有啥区别 比特币十大主流币
- ·dex交易所排名
- ·四轮电动车价格大揭秘!四轮电动车多少钱
- ·eth钱包支持uni-eth钱包usdt
- ·轻松赶走脸上螨虫的5个妙招!如何去掉脸上的螨虫
- ·冷钱包托管
- ·币圈十大比特币交易所app下载最新榜单合集一览 九月推荐榜单更新
- ·虚拟电厂概念31日主力净流出1.28亿元,浙大网新、国电南瑞居前
- ·80公斤等于多少斤?80是多少斤
- ·普通人能用 U 卡吗?U 卡发卡商会不会出事?
- ·市北高新收盘涨2.49%,主力资金净流出2518.98万元
- ·银川5月穿什么衣服-银川5月穿什么衣服合适
- ·Bitcoin White Paper 16th Anniversary! Online news release: Satoshi Nakamoto will reveal his true identity
- ·营业利润率怎么算?
- ·木林森收盘涨0.35%,主力资金净流出2489.1万元
- ·量数币 (MDT) 购买指南及交易所推荐
- ·当MBTI遇上区块链:你的性格能否助你赚大钱?
- ·申报减免个税填写有误会影响征信吗
- ·ETC充币平台-etc充值软件叫什么
- ·比特幣突破 7.1 萬美元,市占比逼近 60%,ETH/BTC 比率持續下探
- · 数字货币交易平台app
- · 欧易交易所 电脑
- · oe交易所app下载
- · 欧亿app官网正式版下载
- · 欧易app官方下载入口
- · 欧易正规
- · 欧易最新版本
- · okcoin交易平台
- · 虚拟货币交易
- · okx交易所app官网链接
- ·全球领先以太坊钱包有哪些?正规官方数字币交易软件最新榜单
- ·汇川技术(300124.SZ):预计公司10月份通用自动化业务订单会实现同比正增长
- ·知名度高ADA安币装包哪个最好?全球热门ADA安币装包榜单一览
- ·VPN概念31日主力净流出1.87亿元,中科曙光、天融信居前
- ·在哪里买比特币在哪里下载软件购买 区块链交易所排名列表
- ·AI手机概念31日主力净流出24.39亿元,光弘科技、领益智造居前
- ·419骗局揭秘,小心这些套路!419是什么意思
- ·商业承兑汇票付款方账务处理
- ·Bitget如何购买USDT?Bitget交易所链上充币提币教程
- ·深度数据分析:Solana 真的超越 EVM 链了吗?从流动性池质量看区块链竞争格局